Recently, the phenomenon of smartphone invention and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the dynamic invention is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that recent smartphone invention can be a plus and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, smartphone can provide connection to each other with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic experiment which discovered current issues. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of this phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can ve seen.
With the realm of public arena, android operating phones might increase the consequences of critical issues. As far as the society is concerned, the ultimate aim of these inventions is to make life of people convenient. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is logical to assume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of developed smartphone far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of these gadgets prove the significance of improved lifestyle, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.716 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25665104056 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3901505294 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854851572679 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290394874742 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319772412341 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046471193153 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355499480985 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.