One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that there is a colossal upsurge in the numbers of tourists. There is a widespread concern that the entrant of tourists which is one of the sources of income could be the cause of degradation of the country's prosperity. Despite some advantages and disadvantages of the inflow of tourists, in my opinion, for some developed countries first one updo the last one.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that both the internal and external tourists are one which helps to boost the economy of the country. In fact, not only do the tourist increase the income of the local businesses but also locals get an opportunity to broaden their knowledge. Similarly, we can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that the local citizens are able to preserve the cultures developed by their ancestors. Needless to say, all these merits stand the country in good stead, as far as the positive factors of the tourism is concerned.
On the other hand, one of the detrimental concern of the travel and tourism is mention that the country who is welcoming tourists from different countries of the world are increasing the risk of many crimes. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that some people travel only for trafficking like drugs, young innocent girls, and so on. Hence, it is apparent why some are against the travel and tourism despite its benefits.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of travel and tourism for the developed countries are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ould be the cause of degradation of the countries prosperity. Despite of some advantages...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, similarly, so, for example, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82167832168 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66788715815 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.206205449 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146423885219 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576918092372 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536072251851 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935231279055 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034612901278 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.