One of the most conspicuous debates of today's world is the design of the buildings. There is a widespread worry that some support the statement that the building's design has a positive impact on people's life and work but proponents are against it. In my opinion, the way the building is constructed really affects the life and work both positive and negatively.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that well-facilitated buildings make people's life and work very easy and run smoothly. In fact, not only do well-architected buildings save time but also money. For instance, the lifts in a well-designed skyscraper in Australia makes people reach to the top of the floor within -seconds with very less effort. Needless to say, all these merits stand for the positive impact of people's life and work in good stead, as far as the building's design is considered.
On the other hand, the detrimental aspect of this argument is that people will west their hard time of life by collecting a lot of money to build designed buildings. Besides, a poor person can never think of constructing well-facilitated buildings, means they will never have a good life and work. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that people living in the slum area of India always have the negative thought. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the positiveness in their life and work because of building design.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of the design of buildings provide the positive impact on people's life and work are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, really, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80128938566 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6487493937 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49855679125 0.242375264174 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1862507569 0.0925447433944 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100855695578 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321689448057 0.151781067708 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415389604298 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.