One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge debate whether effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. There is a widespread worry that some people say learning is disturbed by employment but some proponents argue it is possible. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that learning needs lot of time, effort and concentration. One cannot get enough time for study when they are doing the job. In fact, not only do employment kills study time but also makes tired. For instance, a full-time worker after working eight hours gets tired and is very hard for him to focus in study where he needs some time for rest. Needless to say, all these demerits stand for the effect of learning in negative stead, as far as time required is considered.
On the other hand, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that a laborious person manages time despite of being busy doing employment. A lazy person always seeks excuse. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that in Nepal, full-time students are allowed to work full-time where they can earn and take their study forward at a same time. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of the study and employment doing at same time.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of studying and doing employment at same the time are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81003584229 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60538223644 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566308243728 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4840475126 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.230769231 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299867583555 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111321196402 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860401387404 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189738593206 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580326555781 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.