Television serves many different functions. It helps people relax, get information and also a companion for lonely.” Do you think this statement is true? Give your opinion and examples.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the debate on Television serving many different functions are beneficial for people and the society. There is a widespread concern that some people believe Television benefits in myriad ways whereas proponents are against it. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that nowadays people are taking lots of advantages from TV. In fact, not only do people enjoy watching the variety of programs and movies but also get lots of information watching news and documentary. One can kill his/ her loneliness by watching their favourite program. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact there are both positive and negative aspects of TV. Needless to say, all these merits stand the importance of TV in good stead, as far as the benefits are considered.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that there are some adult movies and programs broadcasted on TV which are not good for children. Besides, children try to mimic the character they watch and unknowingly get involved in criminal activities. For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that in Australia 60% of the children got involved in the robbery are inspired by the movie they watched before. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the TV programs broadcasted.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of Television services having different functions are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rge in the debate on Television serving many different functions are beneficial for people and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, whereas, for example, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08664259928 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82809534228 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.391826263 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156400747607 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527659793241 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484073796614 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940346622619 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526625284283 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.