Life experience is better than books or formal education? Agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Life experience is better than books or formal education? Agree or disagree?

Whether it is more beneficial to have life experience or to obtain knowledge from formal educations and books is always a debatable topic. Even though, many people complained that nowadays companies require employees only with solid experience. Others reject this notion and argue that such requirement is based on a formal educational background. In this case, further elaboration of both sides of the pros and cons will be discussed in the following essay and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.

To begin with, life experience is a key factor required in the current society. Most of the labor market requires young employees for related experience. The reason is because the life experience in a specific field of work or study often provides skills that is impossible to be taught by a book or a teacher. That’s the skill of communication, team spirit of cooperation and so on. Each skills play as a key performance indicator for a company regarding the profits.
On the flip side, formal education and books are still essential for people to learn technical skills.

Works in the field of computer science, for example, often require a high eligibility of criterion based on the knowledge of programming. As a result, getting a college degree of IT would be a prerequisite. Nowadays online e-books and distant education are also providing people with more efficient ways of studying.

According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the life experience and the knowledge based on formal education and books are equally important.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...ees for related experience. The reason is because the life experience in a specific field...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
..., team spirit of cooperation and so on. Each skills play as a key performance indica...
^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or for a company regarding the profits. On the flip side, formal education and b...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, still, thus, for example, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1953125 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9970586981 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859375 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3592076449 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255639929406 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855971992801 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974340357958 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157966990918 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663598031031 0.0609392437508 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.