Government should look forward more to improving public transportation, instead of expanding the road network for vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Providing public transportation with more improvement rather than further expansion of road networks for private automobiles are always a debatable topic. Even though, many people claim that in today’s daily life public transportation is a basic need that should be optimized immediately. Others reject this notion and argue that road networks are needed to be expanded. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay will further elaborate both sides of the statement with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, the performance of public transportation affects the daily life of almost every people. In Australia, for example, over 90% students choose to travel through public transport system every day. However, delays of bus service and even trains are pretty common, which triggers a series of chain effects such as late for school, missing important appointment and even losing jobs. Increasing the speed of our transport network, particularly with trains and track, as well as adding more shifts of bus and tram services would be a huge boost for the convenience of citizen’s daily travel.
On the flip side, expansion of current road network is reasonable for the increasing trend of traveling by private vehicles. However, it is more beneficial and eco-friendly for the government to invest their money, upgrading the public transport system.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that optimizing public transportation provides more benefits than doing so for the private vehicles. In a nutshell, a good public transport system preserves our environment and also relieves the pressure from road networks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51492537313 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01156159328 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2548945427 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246905843108 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906986854058 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498131014764 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157387288767 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395853911962 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.