Providing formal education with more experimental learning rather than traditional paper based education is always a debatable topic. In fact, many people claim that in today’s job market, graduates with more practical experience often have more advance than those who are with high marks in exams. The following essay agrees with the statement and will further elaborate the reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, the traditional paper based education requires students to analyze questions based on the theoretical knowledge learnt through books, lectures and online materials. However, students without enough experimental learning are often less favorable in the labor market. This huge difference between what our current education system brings to society and what the actual society needs implies that the necessity of introducing more experimental learning courses into the formal curriculums.
On the flip side, if a graduate choose to become a scholar with his major, a different story will be that he might not need a strong skill of communication or teamwork. In that situation, experimental learning could be less valuable compared to traditional paper based learning.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that experimental learning provides huge benefits in formal learning. In a nutshell, it brings graduates with more working opportunities and social skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70967741935 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97119614647 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626728110599 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1402606021 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.9 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169742548674 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689525151339 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393354476916 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104075059891 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035836516168 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.