Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How
realistic do you think it is ? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic?
Recently, the importance of becoming a cashless society has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "Are these society beneficial?". Whereas it is a widely held view that using credit cards for payment is highly beneficial, I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economical standpoint, money transfer development is bound up inextricably with credit cards, which indicates they lead to both cashless society and the online payment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between bank accounts and debit cards as well as an exponential increase in loans. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of bankruptcy correlated positively with not only cashless societies but also credit card users.
Within the realm of social science, without the slightest doubt, overusing credit cards attribute to a cashless society and paying by cards, in that it would come down to online shopping, saving times, and online booking. A salient example of such attribution is credit cards, which is a concern since it was mistaken to take bank credits for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint cashless payments problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of developing payment methods.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborate above, I firmly believe that, using credit cards in daily payments is a good development. However, we perceive that, with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this society' or 'these societies'?
Suggestion: this society; these societies
...bly leads to a moot question, 'Are these society beneficial?'. Whereas it is a wide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborate above, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54121863799 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04426223152 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652329749104 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5108374278 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197652360859 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626332506553 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364831638321 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116597395544 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291673678574 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.