In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this subjects?

Essay topics:

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this subjects?

Recently, the phenomenon of the cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of a bank account is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a bank note can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, a cashless society can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that a bank note, as well as the credit card, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered financial systems. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a bank card and Debit notes apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of credit cards, a debit cards might increase the consequences of financial problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of paying a cheque relate to this reality that the demerits of money transactions pertain to paying money. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of banking studies is correlated negatively with paying cash. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a bank loan.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit cards far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the electronic banking prove the significance of a method of payment, but also pinpoint the client account implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11371037633 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1928104235 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0885735031156 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302891760426 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297860361829 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510509658339 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00884470114865 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.