One of the most conspicuous trends of the today's world is introducing music to the kids to incline their learning performance. As such, there are both merits and demerits associated with introducing special kinds of music to kids, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that children can bring their attention to their studies by listening to different kind of music like as, classic, Jazz, and pop. By adopting music as a subject ' not only can get rid of the boredom of other academic subjects, but they can also increase their level of performance. Needless to say, all these merits stand the learners in good stead, as far as their academic performance is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the benefits of music in promoting learning in early childhood. The primary one stems from the fact that music can distract the students from their studies and can lead to a great failure. Besides, the pupils can also lose their hearing sense by listening to music in the early stage of life. To exemplify, as per the recent survey, 70% of preschool kids who listened to music have lost their hearing abilities. it hardly needs mention that all these demerits have a far-reaching impact on the kid's physical abilities.
To recapitulate, in view of arguments outlined above one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the role of music in making children focused is instrumental indeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and pop. By adopting music as a subject not only can get rid of the boredom of o...
^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...usic have lost their hearing abilities. it hardly needs mention that all these dem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9305019305 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64923392568 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4893059449 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15529755841 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590161066687 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456105484754 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096075077499 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205132675342 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.