Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in the introduction of various types of music in schools. There is a widespread worry that it would only lead to the myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that music is a form of creative art. Not only teaching music helps in broadening the horizons of thinking, but also enable kids to express themselves. Needless to say, all these benefits stand learners in good stead as far as learning music is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that teaching the variety of music can instill in the range of soft skills including effective communication and tolerance. Take classical music for instance, according to the report published in "Time Magazine's latest edition," students of classical music have more strong communication circle than other students without any musical knowledge. Hence, it is apparent why many people, including myself, are in favor of teaching music in schools.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of teaching music in schools are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Magazines the latest'.
Suggestion: Magazines the latest
...g to the report published in 'Time Magazines latest edition,' students of classical mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...d in 'Time Magazines latest edition,' students of classical music have more ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, still, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1380952381 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92320840726 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8069464851 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0909090909 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116517118301 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408082366821 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294051889547 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065795566233 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313698148217 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.