Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in the technological encroachment in the field of medicine.
As such, there are both merits and demerits of video communication between doctor and patient, although I am of the opinion that the merits outdo the demerits.
There is a deluge of benefits that can be attributed to virtual communication among doctor and patients. The most preponderant one is the availability of physician in after-hours which is the source of great mental satisfaction. For example, parents are always worried about the health of their kids and availability of video communication option assure them that in case of medical emergency they can reach GP at any time. It hardly needs mention that patients stand in good stead as far as medical consultation is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the video communication between doctor and patients. The primary one stems from the fact that it is an encroachment in doctor's personal space. Take overreactive patients for instance, according to the survey report published in the "Daily Telegraph," doctors who offer video consultation have 50 percent more working hours than ones who do not.
In the view of argument stated above, one can conclude that the benefits of video communication between doctor and patient are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...t published in the 'Daily Telegraph,' doctors who offer video consultation h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25110132159 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06351480174 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4658511181 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205900189608 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806536168262 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553725808632 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115451206574 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597675112294 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.