In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see people preferring the video conference with doctors due to the state-of-the-art technologies across the world, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. As such, there are both merits and demerits to the given trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits that can be attributed to virtual communication among doctor and patients. Firstly, the most conspicuous one is that with the ubiquity of the internet, people are empowered to diagnose with a physician in their after working hours. Not only does it contribute a great deal for the convenience and require less time than visiting doctor at their place, but it is also a cost-efficient alternative due to the fierce competition and reducing travel expenses. Thus, needless to say, all these merits to consult the doctor with the help of cutting-edge technology keep people in a preponderant position.
However, another pivotal facet of the argument is that these practices are clinically risky and less acceptable to patients, and they bring significant technical and regulatory challenges. For example, according to a report in the "Journal of Medical", the number of fake doctors consulting in through telemedicine has significantly increased. Moreover, it is an encroachment in the doctor's personal space. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that the demerits of video calling can have a far-reaching impact on the society.
To recapitulate from the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that despite having some pitfall, the upsides offered by the video conference in the doctor consultation are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31884057971 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16518222097 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605072463768 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0763855024 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168796336343 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569866061124 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345684302012 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889904530087 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404216359433 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.