Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by humans.
In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the idea of spending astronomical amount of money on the space research across the world, be it an impoverished or affluent nation. At the outset, there are both merits and demerits to the given trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits for the advanced technology of the space satellites. The most conspicuous one is that with the countless number of satellites out there, forecasting weather has never been as precise and accurate as now. Not only can scientists predict flood, storm, tsunami and other calamities with near-perfect precision, due to space exploration, but studies on the space also allow constant contact between satellites, space shuttles and the like which would otherwise be next to impossible. Needless to say, all these merits will keep space research in a preponderant position, as far as the state-of-the-art communication is concerned.
However, another pivotal facet of the argument is that space research entails enormous amounts of expenditure, whereas we have got millions of people starving all over the world. Besides, affluent nations can best use their resources by improving the infrastructures in an array of sectors such as healthcare, education, transport and so on, instead of sending robots to find water on the Mars. Last but not least, the large amounts of money spent on these ventures can be better utilised in uplifting the living standards of people in underprivileged nations. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that the demerits associated with the space exploration will have a far-reaching impact.
To recapitulate from the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that despite having some pitfalls, the upsides of space exploration are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28239202658 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01232004112 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8091239269 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.545454545 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101372666201 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363273811318 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257051606305 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592106419448 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237646597016 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.