Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which is more important?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning handwriting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of recognizing the handwriting is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the terrible handwriting can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, typing methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that merits of the awful handwriting , as well as having good handwriting, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered handwriting analysis. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both handwriting recognition and the unprecedented handwriting apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the clear handwriting might increase the consequences of typing courses. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the typing speed could relate to this reality that the demerits of using typewriters pertain to aggressive children. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of typing skills is correlated negatively with gifted typing. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of computer keyboards.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of school children far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the school curriculum prove the significance of school activities, but also pinpoint clever children implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to handwrite'.
Suggestion: to handwrite
Recently, the phenomenon of learning handwriting and its corresponding impact has sparke...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...act that merits of the awful handwriting , as well as having good handwriting, are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78431372549 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31201859341 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650980392157 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1167566818 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.916666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170562035561 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515361574242 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047606000812 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899421775176 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431289776775 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.