Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning good handwriting by children or typing at school and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures, is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the educational handwriting program can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the legible handwriting can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies and benefits of the computer typing. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly writing software can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, fast vivid handwriting in school might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes and modern typing are correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of children good handwriting in school far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of good handwriting techniques prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74609375 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23786185463 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66015625 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2931407324 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.727272727 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15119220004 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533981973573 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08164919279 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851252320432 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439887150469 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.