Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning handwriting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of typing skills is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that clever children can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, typing methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of handwriting analysis, as well as the school curriculum are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the awful handwriting. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both gifted typists and handwriting recognition apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the clear handwriting might increase the consequences of typing courses.Moreover, fundamental aspects of having good handwriting could relate to this reality that the demerits of computer keyboards pertain to school activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of recognizing the handwriting correlate negatively with the typing speed. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of talented children.
To end, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the school children far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the unprecedented handwriting prove the significance of the school syllabus, but also pinpoint typing skills implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to handwrite'.
Suggestion: to handwrite
Recently, the phenomenon of learning handwriting and its corresponding impact has sparke...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ease the consequences of typing courses.Moreover, fundamental aspects of having good ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of typing courses.Moreover, fundamental aspects of having good handwriting could...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74117647059 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32438475893 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639215686275 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.554890628 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184432834186 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593819747963 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285121986656 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101712685282 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160219156067 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.