Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of expanding cities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the capital city is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructed and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the city life can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, expanding the public transport can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of transportation systems, as well as the structure of transportation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the transportation cost. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the private transport and private cars apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, building roads might increase the consequences of the roadway transport industry. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of railway costs could relate to this reality that the demerits of the traffic congestion pertain to the traffic jam. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of road passengers is correlated negatively with road transport. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of public safety.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of car facilities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing cities prove the significance of transportation expenditure, but also pinpoint transportation development implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68461538462 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35124281459 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8345195579 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14928842803 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494131951472 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298567844442 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811807313408 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209800876868 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.