As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Nowadays, it is irrefutable that a complete transport system plays an important role in expanding cities. Recently, whether governments should focus on improving public transportation or building more roads for vehicle owning population has sparked a heated debate across the globe. I believe that public transport plays a vital role in good transport system and this essay will elaborate how a better road system helps to enhance the daily transportation system in environmental and economic view.
To commence with, public transport is more environmentally friendly than vehicles. As research shows that carbon dioxide emission from vehicles is the major reason contribute to global warming, encouraging citizens take public transport instead of driving own vehicle can efficiently reduce air pollution and slows down climate change. It helps to solve environmental challenges as well as improving the health of citizens. As a result, building public transportation should be government priority from an environment point of view.
Secondly, from an economic perspective, a well-developed public transportation networks save moneys. For individuals, having own cars means lots of expenditure such as insurances and services. In fact, research shows that only families or friends who share private vehicle to work or study benefits from this. Moreover, improving public transportation is cheaper than building more roads from a government view. Hence, it is a cheaper way with a higher efficiency which our government should do.
In conclusion, although building roads can benefit certain groups of people from building more roads, the government can reach a better effect with less cost to create better public transportation network. Therefore, the government must investigate ways and take necessary step to improve public transport system to benefit the majority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-26 | Janabakhshi | 77 | view |
- Cashless society is becoming a reality More and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash How realistic do you think to achieve cashless society What are the benefits or problems of this phenomenon 77
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 83
- Business and commercial organizations should help to solve environmental challenges To what extent do you agree with this opinion 77
- Nowadays it is increasingly more difficult to maintain the right balance between work and other aspect of one s life such as leisure time with family members How important do you think is this balance What kind of people would find it hard to achieve 65
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...uilding public transportation should be government priority from an environment point of v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71684587814 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09576596491 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9224689073 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291790071216 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108064160629 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782186445502 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19127779656 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239070378805 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...uilding public transportation should be government priority from an environment point of v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71684587814 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09576596491 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9224689073 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291790071216 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108064160629 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782186445502 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19127779656 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239070378805 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.