As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
People around the globe opine that transportation is requisite to live an affluent life. There is a pervasive apprehension that its absence will consequently lead to an assortment of tribulations in one’s life. I beg to differ and my views will reflect in the upcoming paragraphs with a plausible conclusion.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that means of transportation can not only contribute to ease of travel and portability but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Moreover, there are some more features of the above deliberations which can help a person to transcend in various stages. Besides, only when follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Thus, many citizens are apparently in favour of travelling by private vehicles.
Lastly, to conclude we can reiterate the statement that the advantages of public transportation are indeed too considerable to be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, consequently, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32158590308 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17901163936 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625550660793 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1959534559 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.818181818 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0562237118008 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212452307303 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248945915402 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0356637819296 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105898714301 0.0609392437508 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.