criteria should be used to decide people are paid different occupations
The importance of different occupations which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that people like film actors or company bosses earn more money for their work. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that doctors and nurses are trained to deal with human body. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some merits but one of the crucial effect is that actors can be seen many audiences so they can earn more and collect a large amount of money. Besides, doctors take also very important role in human life as well as it is very complicated job. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of criteria should be used to decide people are paid different occupations like doctors, film actors or company bosses are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99183673469 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56536375822 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604081632653 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.512685645 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.181818182 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19773470687 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634497632684 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124781597445 0.071462118173 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143564233439 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172733132609 0.0609392437508 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.