decline library day by day
Reason of decline in library day by day
The contemporary human lives in the word, which is currently being shaped by the latest trends and approaches. Which mushroomed out from different regions of the globe. Whether library losing their place day by taking place from computers have become a moot point since many years. Opponent and proponent of the views have their own strong arguments. Before I came to the any conclusions, I would like to shed some lights on the both views in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To start with it is witnessed that, Ancient people using library before they do have any computers but they more knowledge and experience of life. Reading skills was very superior. For example, old age pupils still they away from 21st century.
On the hand there are some drawbacks but the most important is that internet such google search engines help to us to find the right books in minutes or we can reserve the book when ever you want. In the library finding right books hard in this time because humans being tremendously busy in their busy life chore, that’s by library shutdown day by day.
After pondering over a great of thoughts and deliberation with myself I concluded that. Advancement and technologies take place of library which is more preferred in the global. Although it has some disadvantages, but we cannot ignore the bright side of the picture.
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should it build more roads? Agree or disagree? 87
- should universities impose penalties on students for late submission of assignments? 84
- computer and online games should not be allowed in schools while studying. 80
- Is medical technology a curse or a blessing 77
- What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in a developing country? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Reason of decline in library day by day The contemporary human lives in the word...
^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed by the latest trends and approaches. Which mushroomed out from different regions o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, for example, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89406779661 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58237943919 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648305084746 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6787081549 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8461538462 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302549619829 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844734846317 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143200811401 0.071462118173 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251025731449 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.314844769542 0.0609392437508 517% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.