Do you agree with involving employees in decision making process?
Recently, the phenomenon of involving employees in the decision-making process and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the revenue of the company is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that boosting participating workers in making an informed decision can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, participating junior workers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that protecting the brand, as well as adding value to the company, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of employees in controlling risk in the workplace. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both promoting of creativity and innovation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of dealing with various customers, involving employees in decision-making process might increase the consequences of the popularity of the company. Moreover, fundamental aspects of bankrupt of managers would relate to this reality that the demerits of exploiting of financial resources pertain to the unreliable employee. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of leaking out the secret information of the company is correlated negatively with wrong decision making. Hence, it is correct to presume the perceived notion of reliable employees.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of involving employees in decision-making process far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving the quality of products prove the significance of increasing the capacity income, but also pinpoint the responsibility of both manager and employee as practical implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71335504886 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34455206253 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6918270105 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.166666667 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31197749327 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101461655778 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119039785306 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174908196031 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748620271294 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.