Do you agree with involving employees in decision making process?
Recently the phenomenon of involving employees in the decision-making process and its corresponding aspects has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of boosting the revenue of the company is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that participating workforce can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, involving the employee in making the decision can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that adding value, as well as protecting the brand of enterprise, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the influence of involving the employee in making an informed decision. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both improving the quality of products and promoting the popularity of the company apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of promoting the creativity and motivation of workers, participating employees in company’s decision might increase the consequences of the popularity of the company. Fundamental aspects of behavioral corruption would relate to this reality that the demerits of exploiting the financial resources pertain to financial corruption. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of leaking the secret information of the company is correlated negatively with the unreliable workforce. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the responsibility of the manager.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of involving the employee in company outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of lucrative business prove the significance of job satisfaction, but also pinpoint the common goals of the manager and employee as practical implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and employee as practical implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7064516129 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36750864351 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6389069852 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.416666667 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259560534268 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785961252697 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920283266648 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137268569709 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443624576132 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.