Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether the real change can be made at the government level or individuals?”. It is a widely held view that the performance of the government to diminish the environmental pollution is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that environmental contamination must be dealt with scrupulously.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the government plays a vital role to address the pollution problem. Therefore, I express some reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the eco-friendly fuels or renewable source energy, such as solar or electrical energy must be replaced with the detrimental fossil fuels to diminish the toxic gases. Secondly, the government is in charge of encouraging people to leave their defective or private cars at home and use the comprehensive transport system instead. In addition to this information, the beneficial loans must be offered to factories to relocate to less beautiful areas in order to address the side effects of pollution like the destruction of the ozone layer, health problem, global warming, acid rain, and the extinction of wildlife.
However, undoubtedly the environmental contamination provides people with various points. It is not rational to lay the blame for environmental pollution just on the government. Moreover, individuals are responsible to eliminate this crisis by using public transport system as well as to participate in the educational session to raise their public awareness about damaging the consequence of environmental pollution on health, ecosystem, and wildlife.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that the real changes must be made by the government to decrease the environmental pollution. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 309.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54368932039 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34395517563 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.5149557008 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271399314326 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956869566572 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998765094284 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167560453748 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087465510686 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.