Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents are the best teachers.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. You should give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.
Parents are the epitome of god for children because they impart all crucial things, which are responsible for reinforcing children’s fulcrum in terms of moral values, ethics and many more. Thus, it is fair to say that parents are the best teachers, but there are certain things which cannot be furnished by the parents. Therefore, I partially accord with this statement.
To begin with, children have their existence in this world due to parents, as a result they learn first activity of their life from their parents only, therefore it is completely justifiable to say that knowledge, which is given by parents is priceless, and hence they are the best teacher owing to manifold reasons. Firstly, parents spend more time with their children as compare to anyone, thereby they know all the vulnerable points of their children, which can only be ameliorated by parents only. Secondly, knowledge about traditions, cultures and values can only be given by parents, which again plays a pivotal role in children’s success because it supplements the academic knowledge. Furthermore, children feel attached and can conveniently share their hurdles with their parents, as a result they can cope with any ramification with ease. For instance, it has been found that children who do not have parental influence suffer from various plights.
However, every situation is accompanied with multifarious alternatives, which is similar in this case. It is notable that parents are not able to give an adequate time to their children on account of hectic life, and thus it is better to send children in school or other educational institution. Here, it proves that parents cannot be an efficient teacher on account of plethora reasons. Firstly, parents are usually less professional in terms of the theoretical and academic knowledge than the instructors who teach in schools. Secondly, a huge generation gap between parents and children may affect the parent’s performance to become perfect teachers. Thirdly, Parents are sometimes too blind to notice the bad side of their children, which is not the case with teachers because they make neutral judgments.
In conclusion, I opine that no one can take place of parents, as their role is essential for holistic development of children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-02 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 100
- Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both the views and give your opinion 88
- Some believe that people should not continue to work once they reach the age of retirement. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience. 100
- Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punish 100
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...en by parents, is priceless, thus, they are best teacher due to manifold reasons. Firstl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.5418719212 209% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1207.87684729 156% => OK
No of words: 350.0 242.827586207 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92582589073 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6888621703 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823435529291 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395795488433 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274997886243 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583770418001 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273434510025 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.