Do you that with online information library books are useless?
Recently, the phenomenon of using online websites making library books useless and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of online websites is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online searching can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the online internet search for library books can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of electronic books, as well as online book reading, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered web-based searches. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both search engines and virtual libraries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, online information about library books might increase the consequences of traditional book reading. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hard copy can relate to this reality that demerits of paper books pertain to wasting money. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of paying money is correlated negatively with wasting resources. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of information technology.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online libraries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of PDF books prove the significance of saving time, but also pinpoint information technology implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-10 | sadegh shahsavand | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | sadegh shahsavand | 85 | view |
- do you agree that universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses? 88
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 69
- do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others? 88
- what are the advantages and disadvantages of a cashless banking system 85
- do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63358778626 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10889518945 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656488549618 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4800606821 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371104823311 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111456052233 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902995555293 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198134610435 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200763974805 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.