Do you think consumer should avoid over package product or it the responsibility of producer to avoid the extra packaging of product ? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience?
The issue of avoid over packaged products, which has always debatable, but has now become more controversial. Today, over packaged products are flooding the market. Since, over packaging cost the consumers as well as the environment. There is an urgent need to curtail its usage. This is producer’s responsibility to shun such as packaging products. This essay will explore how it can be overcome in the upcoming paragraph before particular conclusion.
To begin with, packaging often shoots up products much. Therefore, loss packaging automatically price downwards. For example, MacDonald packs their products loss packaging and put in the containers. Many Package products are available in market who is used to very bad effect for environments. The producers avoid this packaging product all the markets.
To the other hand, packaging products are very bad effect own environments. Also, over packaging is catalyst for environment damage such as it augment co2 gas emission. It is producer responsibility to decrease harm ecosystem. For example, box packaging cost trees which cost not only buyer and seller but the whole planet.
To sum up, as aforementioned, every coin has two sides, I think, this is a producer responsibility. Producers should avoid this packaging product because this packaging is very harmfully and pollute the environment and every one should avoid this packaging and safe own their environment.
- new Doctors should work in rural areas discuss, 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc should be supported or not. 79
- Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles skates the subway etc 44
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Some people think that, it is better to teach girls and boys together. What is your opinion about this? Discuss. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd every one should avoid this packaging and safe own their environment.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48416289593 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10644606683 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8309078783 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2941176471 104.977214359 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.9669160288 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370707565559 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130864983926 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863019174955 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241657057121 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400373003998 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.94827586207 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.