Packages products can be found in our daily lives, some may have it more than others. While the reason can be different, this overuse of material is far from ended. Some people would argue that consumers should avoid it while others pointing fingers as producer responsibility. It is felt that producers should play a more pivotal role in this situation, especially with the growing range of products found in society these days.
To commence with, producers use packaging to deliver their product to customers and to keep it in a good condition. It can be seen as necessary to reduce their packaging content, as this would lead in reducing cost. For example, fast food companies like McDonalds have been using a less plastic bag for their takeaway meal. This has reduced their costs by a staggering 30% compared to the year before. As a result, by diminishing their material, companies can actually save substantial money from this activity.
Furthermore, manufacturers can reduce their carbon footprint by using recycled material. To cite an example, local milk factory Meiji has been using a recycled cartoon in their packaging. A positive benefit from using recycled material is how it can reduce environmental waste by 15% when compared to a non-recycled material. This example can show how companies have a direct influence in going green.
In recapitulation, after analysing both aspects of benefit, it is felt strong that manufacturers have more responsibility in reducing container. It is hoped that someday all companies would understand the liability and negative aspect from over using material container.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26538461538 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89785423574 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580769230769 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.629548357 50.4703680194 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2666666667 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103416450992 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392491200731 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530358423635 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639646669203 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564636321507 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.