Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
The substantial influences of over-packaging have sparked a controversy amongst the public. Although specific arguments claimed that overwrapping is producers fault, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am highly inclined to accept that extra packaging should be avoided by producers and consumers. The agenda of this article is to discuss both sides and will lead to a legitimate conclusion
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why over-packed goods are produced. The most remarkable one lies in the fact that end-user prefers lavishly wrapped products. For instance, shop owners always put extra wrapping goods on the shelves with the highest visibility. Besides, it is recently alleged that un-wrapped fruits and vegetables seem cheap by purchasers. Hence, it can be clearly seen that extra package could influences shopping habits, social behaviors, environmentally friendly responsibilities, advertisement agencies economic, as well as our national duties to save our earth for next generations.
Contrary to popular belief, there remain drawbacks clouded up the influences of extra packed products. The most alarming one rooted in the fact that good's covers and fruit's wraps are usually made of non-reusable materials. Collecting and recycling wasted packages are costly and arduous tasks, which have been paid by taxpayers. Based on a recent research, conducted by a group of profound environmentalists, only 5% of good's packages has been recycled. Hence, buying wrapped products are closely connected with our natural resources, social responsibilities, consumer protection acts, fair trade policy, as well as world trade organization.
To recapitulate, while there are several divergent opinions on both sides, my sentiment is that producers, consumers, distributors, as well as local reseller must be careful about over-packed goods and try to change end-user shopping behavior
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'influence'
Suggestion: influence
...e clearly seen that extra package could influences shopping habits, social behaviors, envi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...hat producers, consumers, distributors, as well as local reseller must be careful about ov...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75261324042 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20332825376 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662020905923 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6296746433 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15518665416 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511357444276 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561470904525 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877067544201 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590233676973 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.