Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25-year-old is necessary
Recently, the phenomenon of the voting right and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of young people is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that your driver's license can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, driving carefully can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that voting campaigns, as well as young drivers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered road accidents. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and age discrimination apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, compulsory voting might increase the consequences of abstention. Moreover unique aspects of careful drivers relate to this reality that the demerits of careless drivers pertain to youngsters. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of abstaining is correlated negatively with voting for politicians. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the age of 25.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of voting for candidates far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of old drivers prove the significance of voting for people, but also pinpoint human rights implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ncrease the consequences of abstention. Moreover unique aspects of careful drivers relat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.528 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18904123523 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8662235538 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141663299893 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458714172482 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501423385828 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817978174159 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578107584407 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.