Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?
Recently, the phenomenon of remaining English as a global language and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of English in globalization is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that English can be a plus in globalization and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Form the social standpoint, remaining English as a global language can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that being a powerful expression way as well as becoming a united method of speaking, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered English facilitate the method of learning and would be easy to learn for any nationality. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being a united language and being easy to learn for other countries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of international issues, globalization and English as a global language might increase the consequences of having more effort to learn a second language for other nationalities. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of becoming a bilingual speaker related to this reality that the demerit of learning another language pertains to selecting the language and allocating enough time. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of English as an international language is correlated negatively with difficulty to be learned as a second language. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of learning English as a united language is more effective.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being English as an international language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being bilingual prove the significance of English, but also pinpoint confusion implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1207.87684729 148% => OK
No of words: 325.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48923076923 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27804242349 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6960136932 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38182601901 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147568184571 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699177047645 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234950973067 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636665528186 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.