Recently, the phenomenon of remaining English as a dominant language in spite of globalization and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of English as an international language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that remaining English as a main communicational language in globalization would be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Form the social standpoint, English as a global language can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that technology enhancement as well as business communication, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered most of the invented instruments have a dependency on English research papers. Thus, the beneficial consequences of English papers on technology development and being a business language apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of politics, English as dominant language might increase the consequences of translation facilities. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the dominance of other languages except English related to this reality that the demerit of difficult translation pertains to language structure. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of other languages such as Chinese is correlated negatively with the level of sophistication. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of English as an easy translate language.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of remaining English as a global language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of providing research for invention and enhancement prove the significance of English as a main communicational language, but also pinpoint translation implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73548387097 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4567703404 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8083618029 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.166666667 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343829128249 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126139257364 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869448835759 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208083818339 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774977638406 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.