Recently the phenomenon of taking formal written examinations and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this way of assessing knowledge at school cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical assessment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss formal written examinations. At first, written tests enforce the students to study all the lessons related to the exam and learn their lessons. However, the written assignments are very beneficial for the students' future. For example, the theoric examinations of lessons like chemistry cannot teach practical use of this remarkable science to students.
In addition, many sciences such as chemistry, physics, and computer need to be learned in laboratory and workshop. Written exams are suitable for lessons like geography and casual lessons that are not necessary for the future of students. For instance, a recent scientific research has shown that practical examination makes students able to learn important parts of knowledge needing for their life in later.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of written examinations are far outweighed their benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently the phenomenon of taking formal...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f this remarkable science to students. In addition, many sciences such as chemi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent scientific research'.
Suggestion: recent scientific research
...r the future of students. For instance, a recent scientific research has shown that practical examination ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge needing for their life in later. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55251141553 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97217835351 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607305936073 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3617562013 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.545454545 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215806498309 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766383547239 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501565575929 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125776601829 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663331415735 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.