Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Recently, the phenomenon of video communication with doctor and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a subtantial number of individual. I am inclined to believe that helping patients can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, curing any disease can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that doctor apointment, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiement which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both medicene treatment and chronic disease apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, remote connection might increase the consequences of improving Information Technologyskills. As a tangible example, some sientific research undertaken a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conlcude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of remote treatment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80769230769 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.314688707 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696581196581 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0600788486 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.545454545 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154289613299 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466809109084 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066159497714 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747190691008 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638433649626 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.49 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.