Age discrimination occurs when decision is made on person's age
Recently, the phenomenon of age discrimination and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I am inclined to believe that decision making can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, person's age can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both underestimating the power of young people and the capability of older man apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, social equality might increase the consequences of social responsibility. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated with negative issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving capability far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny issues potential implications.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76371308017 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34947222668 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691983122363 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0704002067 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104746058214 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326343959471 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05316678031 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514648825 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517687594128 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.