In the education system, assessment through written formal examinations is still valid or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of in the education system, an assessment through written formal examinations is still valid or not and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the written formal examination can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial validity of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, written formal examinations can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, written formal examinations might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of written formal examinations far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89090909091 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35800806756 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7279507161 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308248151592 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101506404367 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1630729756 0.071462118173 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171051793345 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151838150292 0.0609392437508 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.