effects of tourism on developing countries.do you agree or disagree?

These days, there is a controversial debate between members of society about the impacts of tourism on developing countries. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of tourism as thoroughly constructive for developing countries, while others hold an opponent view. I am inclined to believe that this practice in beneficial and should be promoted.

There are several reasons why tourism in developing countries is advantageous. First of all, it is argued that tourism plays a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This is attributed to the fact that communicating with the people from other countries could help people of the host country to improve their knowledge of the world, therefore it would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which consequently would open avenues toward many daunting tasks. Take people from Africa for example, even the richest ones have to do uphill struggle to find out more about the culture of the other countries.

In addition, it is claimed that tourism in developing countries is beneficial for their economy. This is to say that tourism brings about a myriad of opportunities for the host country to improve the local businesses, which would instill strong feeling of self-esteem, so that people are more likely to do up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 found that the workplace developed by tourism could enhance individual's intellectual abilities to make decisions related to social and personal life.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that tourism in developing countries enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of a community and increases the people's confidence. It is expected that the governments take cognizance of these facts and adopt the ways of increasing the number of tourists in developing countries.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ciency of a community and increases the peoples confidence. It is expected that the gov...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06534034077 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552542372881 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1569471876 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244271329015 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997879931542 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578202595185 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159210899974 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033223838388 0.0609392437508 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.