Experience is more effective way to teach compared to books agree and disagree?
The importance of the experience is more effective way to teach compared to books, which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the integral part the upside of imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the is more effective way to teach compared to book is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that it is increased the knowledge. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the more effective way to teach compared to books for the amelioration of society.
However, it has some various who choose to think different differently and hold an opposing the viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence of the more effective way to teach compared to books? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that teach is no more effective the new young students. Hence, it is apparent that the download of the more effective way to teach compared to books cannot be ignored.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the more effectively way to teach compared to books? While it is evident it has benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and agains...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...s always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng students. Hence, it is apparent that the download of the more effective way to teach comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19847328244 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12823458845 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507633587786 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3346153657 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530812305367 0.242375264174 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203526598087 0.0925447433944 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165873293187 0.071462118173 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336935794469 0.151781067708 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914067822981 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.