Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of educational achievement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that Academic qualification market can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal education can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of well-rounded education, as well as conventional education, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learner’s performance and educational facilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning environment might increase the consequences of theoretical knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of training courses is correlated negatively with the learning disorder. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational perspective.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of experience learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational strategies prove the significance of the fastest learning environment, but also pinpoint excellent books implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07224334601 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51033979929 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657794676806 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4920626739 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158145722795 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545664748449 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118883343726 0.071462118173 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888239649725 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801544643458 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.