In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the ongoing trend that learning from experience is most efficient way in contrast with books, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. Some people believe that learning from experience is the most catalyze way then books, while others disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate learning through experience plays a vital role in one’s life.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits, firstly, people getting experience from the past experience conquer swiftly and will boost-up with the confidence with practical errors. For example, people working in many field industries experiences learning from the practical field experience, they come up with many hurdles which gives real experience in ways of tackling the practical things. Hence, needless to say that experience is always a powerful tool in grasping a practical exposure and efficient way of learning.
To embark this, another pivotal facet is that fewer people getting a vast exposure on learning from theoretical books may not be confident to execute when getting from the experience. For instance, in most of the offices working as craft or designer will have a theoretical knowledge from books which still keep them as a book worm, where they are still lacking the way learn from experience. Clearly, in all means learning from experience is the apropos way.
To recapitulate from the arguments that aforementioned, one can reach out to a conclusion that learning from books gives us the guidelines, but the upsides of learning from experiences is indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...tly, people getting experience from the past experience conquer swiftly and will boost-up with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'theoretical knowledge'.
Suggestion: theoretical knowledge
... working as craft or designer will have a theoretical knowledge from books which still keep them as a b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2480620155 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78305370005 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562015503876 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0211720759 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172057977712 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887034486926 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353212037614 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112444742145 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287722698256 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.