Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books. Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university, Which one do you agree is more effective?
Personal experiences is more effective way of teaching compared to books sparked the heated argument among individuals. Many people believe that learning through our own experiences and hard times play a major role in learning. I strongly agree with the statement that the knowledge that we gain from our daily situations are worth compared to traditional learning. This essay would further discuss about reasons why learning through experience is more useful with real time examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, experience means the knowledge which we earn through our daily activities. It means the experience is not limited and it is varied and increased from situation to situation. The experiences we gather our daily activities help us to rectify our future act. Moving further, each and every situation is not mentioned in the books that we read and lessons taught in university and high school, few things we learn from our own practice that happens in our daily activities. For instance, no book or no lecture will teach us how to live our life alone, how to share our feelings and how to create self-respects, it is the hard times that we face in our lives teach us how to overcome all these problems.
Furthermore, books provide only basic knowledge of topic like techniques of selling, production, marketing and planning but these techniques can be implemented only if we have better experience in respective field. The hardest and important lessons we learn in life comes from our participation in different situations and masters those skills by practice. Experiencing our own mistakes and disasters will help us to deal with life in tough conditions.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that books, teachers and parents give us guidelines but our experience to the situations give the perfection of life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 20.9802955665 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17532467532 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89917430857 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561688311688 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.967918702 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177683181498 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713425810307 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676188924907 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111302760968 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903164368708 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.