Experience is more effective way to tech, compared to book? agree and disagree.
The importance of the experience is more effective way to tech, compared to book, which has always been debatable has no upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against I, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instrument are instruments indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertion and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the experience is more effective way to tech, compared to books is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that advantage. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the experience is more effective way to tech for the overall amelioration of society.
However, it has some people who choose to think different and hold an opposing viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the experience is more effectively way to tech? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the experience is more effectively way to tech cannot be ignored.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the experience is more effectively way to tech, compared to book. While it is evident, it has various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...as always been debatable has no upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against I, th...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34126984127 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25603883019 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531746031746 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8070263263 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519601099489 0.242375264174 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187721687515 0.0925447433944 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175790943356 0.071462118173 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339648759312 0.151781067708 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731829169307 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.