The experience of work is more important than having a qualification. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The experience of work is more important than having a qualification. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of the experience of work is more important than having a qualification and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having a qualification is important can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, having a qualification and experience are both important for work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, a qualified worker is more important than the experienced worker might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having work experience and a qualification are important far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...d in this fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny issues apos; potential implications.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34244844257 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8900950799 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.090909091 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237087685724 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836765604413 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987759378902 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138766873375 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569571147621 0.0609392437508 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.