In recent years, whether formal examinations are the only effective way to access a student’s performance sparked heated debate. Although such a topic is contested by many, it is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that formal exams are not the only way to measure students’ proficiency.
To begin with, there are several reasons why continual assessments such as coursework and projects are essential to count student's abilities. One of them is that by using these types of exercises students get knowledge of the use of theories rationally. For example, some students have only theoretical knowledge of different topics, but when they did projects or coursework on related topics, it gives them knowledge of how to use those terms practically.
On the other hand, some people argued that formal tests are the only way to know a student's understanding. They have a different view and say that it can be a good thing. First thing it is claimed that it is a comprehensive and easy way to measure student's knowledge. Moreover, students can also give attention to their studies by formal exam. According to the survey held by the University of South Australia, 79% of the graduate students passed through regular exams have full knowledge of the specified field.
In conclusion, according to the above points, formal examinations and Practical activities are plays a significant role in the education of students. Both viewpoints are very important in my opinion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23320158103 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09468245156 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1828079256 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327705589288 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105211090044 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896837609645 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170282486442 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802190085025 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.