Global Warming
Recently, the phenomenon of global warming and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world. Although it is a widespread belief that the matter of preserving of the environment is highly beneficial, a fair number of academic researchers view this from their theoretical perspective. Nonetheless, I am inclined to believe that one should carefully weigh up the pros and cons of it.
From a social standpoint, ozone depletion is inextricably bound up with deforestation, which means it might be a deciding factor in both desertification and co2 emission. For example, a prestigious university undertook a longitudinal study in 2015 to demonstrate the relationship between fossil fuels and rising in the earth temperature as well as deforestation rate. Not only were the findings somewhat inconsistent with those of previous studies, but also some convincing evidence presented thus far support the contention that pollution is correlated positively with diesel oil.
In political terms, renewable energy is undoubtedly attributable to modern technology, in that it would lead to electric cars, solar power, and wind turbines. According to my first-hand experience, a vivid illustration of such attributions is greenhouse gases, which are cause for concern since our modern society has overlooked in taking it for granted. Hence, the dominant role of new sources of energy apparently can be seen.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the advantages of academic research in global warming are of more significance. However, the local authorities are recommended to amend some existing legislation to minimize undesirable side effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ming and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58113207547 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28710654219 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698113207547 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8103640808 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.454545455 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134447427773 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472178169528 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10016411568 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08508917356 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866863912127 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.