Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the government should reduce their investment in art, music, and painting. Whereas some people say that the government should reduce the expenses, I sanguinely believe otherwise. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that artists overtime becomes the identity for the nation. In my own experience, In my college time, students who participated in music, arts, and painting become the identity of my college. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of having artists apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that money spent to promote art is wast, as it adds little values to the country. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is a one-sided view. Hence, It is correct to presume it the preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of investing in artists far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of investing in artists prove its significance, but also pinpoints on implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...e of the most compelling reason is that artists overtime becomes the identity for the n...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ture that money spent to promote art is wast, as it adds little values to the countr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29126213592 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88519449125 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650485436893 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3471517026 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0909090909 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178527803878 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560754641286 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966710800285 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899155296576 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111453107864 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.