Some people think it is not necessary for adults to receive education in class. Self-study is a good way for them to study more effectively. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the adults should have the option of self-study rather receive education in class. Whereas some people say that adult students should not be required to attend the class and should be good with the self-study, I sanguinely believe that education received through the classroom training is the best. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that the classroom provides a favorable environment for study. According to my own experience, when I was a college student, I conducted research which revealed that students who received the education through classroom performed better than the one who opted for self-study. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of education through class apparently can be seen.

On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that self-study provides flexibility to students, they can plan their study for best results. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. Research conducted by the reputed university professors revealed that students who self-study option didn't perform well and lagged behind in their study. Hence, It is correct to presume a preconceived notion.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of education through classroom far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of education through class prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implications of not doing so.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...led that students who self-study option didnt perform well and lagged behind in their...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints the implications of not doing so.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46007604563 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84172141308 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0663972464 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23346602217 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769320916438 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064569993136 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132287768484 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398405565123 0.0609392437508 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.