Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the law changes human behavior. Whereas some people say that law does not impact human behavior, I sanguinely believe that it does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that law affects the human phycology. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which revealed that law changes human behavior. Thus, The beneficial ramification of the change in law apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that law does not change the human behavior, its the environment. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization proved that law changes human behavior. Hence, this is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the skeptics.
To conclude, where there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the change in law far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the change in law prove its significance, but also pinpoints complication of no changing them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...law does not change the human behavior, its the environment. Although it seems oste...
^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that law changes human behavior. Hence, this is correct to presume the preconcei...
^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints complication of no changing them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21658986175 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87477094957 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7279329924 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373466462688 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138551104853 0.0925447433944 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104442724687 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223577191131 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267460243646 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.